Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use task entity attributes instead of folder entity attributes #14

Merged

Conversation

BigRoy
Copy link
Contributor

@BigRoy BigRoy commented Sep 10, 2024

Changelog Description

Use task entity attributes instead of folder entity attributes, only if it is set for the instance.

Additional info

I'm not sure if I've missed any parts where it's also crucial to refactor them in traypublisher. This is mostly a bit of 'search' in the code to see where folder seems relevant to update.

Testing notes:

Not entirely sure how to test these use cases.

  1. Test tray publisher sequences and their "assumed" frame ranges.

@BigRoy BigRoy added the type: enhancement Improvement of existing functionality or minor addition label Sep 10, 2024
@BigRoy BigRoy requested a review from iLLiCiTiT September 10, 2024 21:33
@BigRoy BigRoy self-assigned this Sep 10, 2024
@@ -2,14 +2,14 @@


class CollectFrameDataFromAssetEntity(pyblish.api.InstancePlugin):
Copy link
Member

@iLLiCiTiT iLLiCiTiT Sep 11, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can we change the plugin name too? (e.g. CollectFrameDataFromEntity )

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

That'd require also to change the settings around - and hence deal with backwards compatibility there. Any examples that show how that's done?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

😞

@iLLiCiTiT iLLiCiTiT merged commit d61faa3 into ynput:develop Oct 1, 2024
1 check passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
type: enhancement Improvement of existing functionality or minor addition
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants